Difference between revisions of "Departure from LRH schedules"

From Freie Scientologen
Jump to: navigation, search
(New page: == 90 Stunden Woche in der Sea Org == This Letter I send to RTC on the 21st February 1998, when I was still in the Church. I still expected RTC to handle all the alter-is in Scientology: ...)
(No difference)

Revision as of 21:56, 7 January 2008

90 Stunden Woche in der Sea Org

This Letter I send to RTC on the 21st February 1998, when I was still in the Church. I still expected RTC to handle all the alter-is in Scientology:

Andreas und Telse Grosz
Top International FSMs
RTC Reports Officer
cc: AOSH UK Supercargo
COB RTC
D/Inspector General
D/IG External Affairs
D/IG Internal Affairs
D/IG FLO
Dir legal Enforcement RTC
CO CMO Int
WDC Scientology
Commanding Officer FLO
Flag Data Files
Int Justice Chief
                                                                                 21. Feb. 1998
                                             Alter-Is-Report
                                               on AOSH UK
Dear Sir,
thank you for your answer on a former report, which arrived today.
Today my wife got the attached mailing (Sea-Org-Survey and LRH-reference The Auditor No. 9) 
with a  grave alter-is in the LRH-reference. The survey should be sent back to AOSH UK SO 
recruitment officer. The post stamp is from Gatwick 19. Febr.98.
In german there is written something like "we are prepared for a sixteen hours day and a 
sixty-hours week".
The original speeks about a "twelfe-hour-day".
This is a grave alter-is of LRH and it seems to me, that some squirrels do want to prevent, that a 
lot of new people join the sea org.
In this connection RTC should also have a look, whether there is not only this fake in circulation, 
but also that a lot of sea org members are asked to work much more than these 12 hours a day and 60 
hours a week, as LRH asked them to do.
I personally know some, who are. As I must assume, this is a wide spread alter-is and does a big 
damage to the Sea Org and Scientology.
My wife and I once experienced a D of P interview in an AO, where the D of P was going to asleep 
during the interview!
This is a strategy of our enemy, to keep the Sea Org down. The squirrels would like to see 
overworked sea org members! Who is interested in out-Rudiments? Rudiments are not only necessary for 
PC or Auditors, but are also vital for every responsible post.
LRH reminds us in WTH paragraph 1-5 that we should have an eye on people, who do not sleep enough, 
they endanger others. The most important posts on this planet are held by SO-members, so they should
have enough sleep! - The same is true for a weekend and for a holiday. LRHs references on this 
should be applied. The theory behind this is the Theta-MEST-theory in SOS: Theta goes into MEST and 
when hurt to much, must have a way to withdraw (I don't quote much of LRH, because I only have the 
german issues at hand. Sorry, but I am sure, you know the references).
The usual SO-recruitment placard give this LRH-quote with 12-h-a-day and 60-hours-a-week. (The 
Auditor No. 9). Calculating I came to the conclusion, LRH is speaking about a 5-days-week!
To "interpret" LRH in an 150-%-way and let the juniors work 90 hours or more a week (I was told this
by several SO-members, one is routed out after she got an apoplectic stroke last year) is 
Squirreling and is targeted on a destruction of the Sea Org and by this of Scientology.
In HCO PL 7. Aug. 1965 I "Suppressive Persons, Main Characteristics of" in OEC 1, pg 1007 Ron writes
under point 3:
"A suppressive will try to get rid of an org. Good staff members are a prime target for SPs. In one 
org where an SP got a foothold, 60 % of the staff was gotten rid of and the org almost crashed.
They do it by making people too dissatisfied to produce and so make it impossible for the org to 
earn."
and in point 10 he says:
"10. An SP deals only in restimulation, never easing or erasing."
When a body had not enough sleep or nutrition, the case of the person will easy be restimulated!
And the last LRH-quote, which is often violated, at the end of my report:
"As soon as you knock out one of these dynamics on a human being and say, 'for this individual, this
dynamic cannot possibly exist,' you get trouble, because they all get knocked out. They come down to
the same level, in other words. If you cut out half of one dynamic, you have cut out half of the 
rest of the dynamics. This package of dynamics is very vital to the survival of an individual." LRH 
in ItSE, page 15.
This is true! Please handle!
Andreas Groß